Technology independence

Conflicts & Vendor Incentives Register

Raeburn's policy is to disclose material commercial relationships and incentives that could reasonably matter to a client evaluating our recommendation. Absence from this register must not be used to imply that a vendor has endorsed Raeburn.

CURRENT PUBLIC DECLARATION

No material vendor incentive is currently declared in the public register.

This is a dated disclosure state, not a permanent claim. Any future material incentive or conflict within scope should be recorded and the relevant client/research disclosure made before relying on the affected recommendation.

Register established: 27 August 2026 · Review on material change and at least quarterly.

What we disclose

Vendor partnership

A formal technology/vendor relationship that could reasonably be relevant to a recommendation.

Referral or affiliate compensation

Commission, referral fee, affiliate income or similar economic benefit linked to a client/vendor decision.

Reseller economics

Margin, discount, rebate, credit or incentive arising from resale or implementation.

Ownership/investment

A material financial interest in a technology or provider relevant to advice.

Personal/professional relationship

A relationship that could reasonably be perceived to affect impartiality.

Research support

Material sponsorship, supplied data, funding or in-kind support relevant to published research.

Recommendation rule

A relationship does not automatically disqualify a technology. It does require disclosure when material, alternatives where appropriate, and a recommendation justified by client outcomes and total cost rather than partner economics.